## ℹ️ Description
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #N/A
- Describe the motivation and context for this change.
Ensure update-check compares against release tags instead of moving
branch tips and keep tests/translations in sync.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- compare release commit via tag name first and fall back only when
missing
- update update-checker tests for commit-ish resolution and tag-based
release data
- refresh German translations for update-checker log strings
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* More reliable update checks by resolving commits from tags, branches
or hashes and robustly comparing short vs full hashes.
* Improved prerelease handling to avoid inappropriate preview updates
and better handling of missing release data.
* **Localization & UX**
* Error and prerelease messages now use localized strings; commit dates
shown consistently in UTC and short-hash form.
* **Tests**
* Updated tests to cover the new resolution flow, error cases, and
logging behavior.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
*Provide a concise summary of the changes introduced in this pull
request.*
- Link to the related issue(s): N/A
- Describe the motivation and context for this change.
- Fix empty release notes when using moving `latest`/`preview` tags
without creating temp tags.
- Avoid GitHub App permission errors when pushing tags on
workflow-modifying commits.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Use a fake `tag_name` and anchor `previous_tag_name` to the moving
release tag for generate-notes.
- Add log output showing the refs used for note generation.
- Keep removal of the “Full Changelog” line to avoid broken compare
links.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
## ℹ️ Description
*Provide a concise summary of the changes introduced in this pull
request.*
- Link to the related issue(s): N/A
- Describe the motivation and context for this change.
- Fix empty release notes when using moving `latest`/`preview` tags by
diffing two short‑lived tags.
- Remove the generated “Full Changelog” link because temporary tags are
deleted after notes generation.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Generate release notes using a temp prev tag and a temp head tag to
ensure old → new comparisons.
- Clean up temp tags after notes generation to keep tags tidy.
- Strip the “Full Changelog” line to avoid broken compare links.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [ ] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [ ] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [ ] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
## ℹ️ Description
Fix remaining CodeQL mixed-returns warning in pydantics error message
mapping.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #
- Motivation/context: eliminate implicit return path to satisfy CodeQL
`py/mixed-returns` on `pydantics.__get_message_template`.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Make the default `case _:` fall through and return `None` explicitly
at function end.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Refactor**
* Minor code style adjustment with no functional impact on application
behavior.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
This PR fixes intermittent login detection failures where the bot fails
to detect existing login sessions and unnecessarily re-logins,
potentially causing IP blocks.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #701
- Describe the motivation and context for this change:
Users reported that the bot sometimes fails to detect existing login
sessions (50/50 behavior), especially for browser profiles that haven't
been used for 20+ days. This appears to be a race condition where:
1. `web_open()` completes when `document.readyState == 'complete'`
2. But kleinanzeigen.de's client-side JavaScript hasn't yet rendered
user profile elements
3. The login detection timeout (5s default) is too short for slow
networks or sessions requiring server-side validation
## 📋 Changes Summary
- **Add dedicated `login_detection` timeout** to `TimeoutConfig`
(default: 10s, previously used generic 5s timeout)
- **Apply timeout to both DOM checks** in `is_logged_in()`: `.mr-medium`
and `#user-email` elements
- **Add debug logging** to track which element detected login or if no
login was found
- **Regenerate JSON schema** to include new timeout configuration
- **Effective total timeout**: ~22.5s (10s base × 1.0 multiplier × 1.5
backoff × 2 retries) vs previous ~11.25s
### Benefits:
- Addresses race condition between page load completion and client-side
rendering
- Provides sufficient time for sessions requiring server-side validation
(20+ days old)
- User-configurable via `timeouts.login_detection` in `config.yaml`
- Follows established pattern of dedicated timeouts (`sms_verification`,
`gdpr_prompt`, etc.)
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Added a configurable login-detection timeout (default 10s, min 1s) to
tune session detection.
* **Bug Fixes**
* More reliable login checks using a timeout-aware, two-step detection
sequence.
* Improved diagnostic logging for login attempts, retry behavior,
detection outcomes, and timeout events.
* **Documentation**
* Added troubleshooting guidance explaining the login-detection timeout
and when to adjust it.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
This PR resolves all open CodeQL security warnings by implementing
recommended security best practices for GitHub Actions workflows and
addressing code analysis findings.
**Related**: Resolves CodeQL alerts 37-53
**Motivation**: CodeQL identified 17 security warnings across our
workflows and Python code. These warnings highlight potential supply
chain security risks (unpinned actions), missing security boundaries
(workflow permissions), and false positives that needed proper
documentation.
## 📋 Changes Summary
### Security Hardening
- **Pinned all GitHub Actions to commit SHAs** (26 action references
across 5 workflows)
- Added version comments for maintainability (e.g., `@8e8c483... #
v6.0.0`)
- Dependabot will now auto-update these pinned SHAs securely
### Workflow Permissions
- Added explicit `permissions` block to `update-python-deps.yml`
workflow
- Added explicit `permissions: contents: read` to `publish-coverage` job
in `build.yml`
- Follows principle of least privilege
### Dependabot Configuration
- Enhanced `.github/dependabot.yml` with action update grouping (single
PR instead of multiple)
- Added `rebase-strategy: auto` for automatic conflict resolution
### Code Quality
- Added CodeQL suppression with detailed explanation in
`src/kleinanzeigen_bot/utils/reflect.py`
- Documented why explicit `del stack` is necessary for frame cleanup
(prevents false positive)
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* CI workflows: pinned external actions to specific commits for
reproducible runs and added explicit permission scopes where required.
* Dependabot: grouped GitHub Actions updates into a single consolidated
group for unified updates and auto-rebasing.
* **Documentation**
* Expanded internal comments clarifying cleanup logic to reduce
potential reference-cycle concerns.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
Currently, release changelogs only show the last commit message, which
doesn't provide sufficient visibility into all changes included in a
release. This PR improves the release workflow to use GitHub's
auto-generated release notes, providing a comprehensive changelog of all
commits and PRs since the previous release.
- Addresses the issue of insufficient release changelog detail
- Improves transparency for users reviewing what changed in each release
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Added `--generate-notes` flag to `gh release create` command in
`.github/workflows/build.yml`
- Renamed `COMMIT_MSG` environment variable to `LEGAL_NOTICE` for better
clarity
- Legal disclaimers now append after the auto-generated changelog
instead of replacing it
- The auto-generated notes will include:
- All commits since the last release
- All merged PRs since the last release
- Contributor attribution
- Automatic categorization (New Contributors, Full Changelog, etc.)
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [ ] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Release process updated to embed a bilingual (English/German) legal
notice directly into generated release notes.
* Release creation now auto-generates notes using that legal notice so
published releases consistently include the legal text.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
Fixes a race condition where ads were submitted before all images
finished uploading to the server, causing some images to be missing from
published ads.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #715
- The bot was submitting ads immediately after the last image
`send_file()` call completed, only waiting 1-2.5 seconds via
`web_sleep()`. This wasn't enough time for server-side image processing,
thumbnail generation, and DOM updates to complete, resulting in missing
images in published ads.
## 📋 Changes Summary
### Image Upload Verification (Initial Fix)
- Added thumbnail verification in `__upload_images()` method to wait for
all image thumbnails to appear in the DOM after upload
- Added configurable timeout `image_upload` to `TimeoutConfig` (default:
30s, minimum: 5s)
- Improved error messages to show expected vs actual image count when
upload times out
- Added German translations for new log messages and error messages
- Regenerated JSON schemas to include new timeout configuration
### Polling Performance & Crash Fix (Follow-up Fix)
- Fixed critical bug where `web_find_all()` would raise `TimeoutError`
when no thumbnails exist yet, causing immediate crash
- Wrapped DOM queries in `try/except TimeoutError` blocks to handle
empty results gracefully
- Changed polling to use `self._timeout("quick_dom")` (~1s with PR #718)
instead of default timeout
- Improved polling performance: reduced cycle time from ~2s to ~1.5s
- DOM queries are client-side only (no server load from frequent
polling)
**New configuration option:**
```yaml
timeouts:
image_upload: 30.0 # Total timeout for image upload and server-side processing
quick_dom: 1.0 # Per-poll timeout for thumbnail checks (adjustable via multiplier)
```
The bot now polls the DOM for `ul#j-pictureupload-thumbnails >
li.ui-sortable-handle` elements after uploading images, ensuring
server-side processing is complete before submitting the ad form.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **New Features**
* Image uploads now verify completion by waiting for all uploaded
thumbnails to appear before proceeding.
* **Improvements**
* Added a configurable image upload timeout (default 30s, minimum 5s).
* Improved timeout reporting: when thumbnails don’t appear in time, the
app returns clearer feedback showing expected vs. observed counts.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
This PR updates the default browser configuration to be safe for
Chrome/Chromium 136+ out of the box.
Chrome 136+ (released March 2025) requires `--user-data-dir` to be
specified when using `--remote-debugging-port` for security reasons.
Since nodriver relies on remote debugging, the bot needs proper defaults
to avoid validation errors.
**Motivation:** Eliminate Chrome 136+ configuration validation errors
for fresh installations and ensure session persistence by default.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Set `browser.arguments` default to include
`--user-data-dir=.temp/browser-profile`
- Set `browser.user_data_dir` default to `.temp/browser-profile`
(previously `None`)
- Regenerated JSON schema (`config.schema.json`) with new defaults
**Benefits:**
- ✅ Chrome 136+ compatible out of the box (no validation errors)
- ✅ Browser session/cookies persist across runs (better UX)
- ✅ Consistent with existing `.temp` directory pattern (update state,
caches)
- ✅ Already gitignored - no accidental commits of browser profiles
**No breaking changes:** Existing configs with explicit
`browser.arguments: []` continue to work (users can override defaults).
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Standardized browser profile configuration with improved default user
data directory settings.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
Added Webselect-Function for Input/Dropdown Combobox
PR for issue/missing feature #677
# Fixes / Enhancements
Finding Special Attributes Elements can fail because they are currently
only selected using the name="..." attributes of the HTML elements. If
it fails, ALSO fallback-handle selecting special attribute HTML elements
by ID instead / additionally. (For example the "brands" Input/Combobox
for Mens Shoes...
When trying to select a Value in a <select>, it does not only rely on
the actual Option value (xxx in the example <options
value="xxx">yyy</...>) but instead also on the displayed HTML value
(i.e. yyy in above example). This improves UX because the User doesnt
have to check the actual "value" of the Option but instead can check the
displayed Value from the Browsers Display directly.
Testcases for Webselect_Combobox were not added due to missing knowledge
about Async Mocking properly.
## 📋 Changes Summary
✅ Fixes & Enhancements
- New WebSelect Functionality
- Improved Element Detection for Special Attributes
- Enhanced <select> Option Matching Logic
This improves UX and test robustness — users no longer need to know the
exact underlying value, as matching also works with the visible label
shown in the browser.
🧩 Result
These updates make dropdown and combobox interactions more intuitive,
resilient, and user-friendly across diverse HTML structures.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [ ] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Field lookup now falls back to locating by ID when name lookup times
out.
* Option selection uses a two-pass match (value then displayed text);
JS-path failures now surface as timeouts.
* Error and log messages localized and clarified.
* **New Features**
* Support for combobox-style inputs: type into the input, open dropdown,
and select by visible text (handles special characters).
* **Tests**
* Added tests for combobox selection, missing dropdowns, no-match
errors, value-path selection, and special-character handling.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Jens <1742418+1cu@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <claude@anthropic.com>
## ℹ️ Description
Eliminate all blocking I/O operations in async contexts and modernize
file path handling by migrating from os.path to pathlib.Path.
- Link to the related issue(s): #692
- Get rid of the TODO in pyproject.toml
- The added debug logging will ease the troubleshooting for path related
issues.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Enable ASYNC210, ASYNC230, ASYNC240, ASYNC250 Ruff rules
- Wrap blocking urllib.request.urlopen() in run_in_executor
- Wrap blocking file operations (open, write) in run_in_executor
- Replace blocking os.path calls with async helpers using
run_in_executor
- Replace blocking input() with await ainput()
- Migrate extract.py from os.path to pathlib.Path
- Use Path() constructor and / operator for path joining
- Use Path.mkdir(), Path.rename() in executor instead of os functions
- Create mockable _path_exists() and _path_is_dir() helpers
- Add debug logging for all file system operations
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [X] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [X] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [X] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [X] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [X] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [X] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Refactor**
* Made user prompt non‑blocking to improve responsiveness.
* Converted filesystem/path handling and prefs I/O to async‑friendly
operations; moved blocking network and file work to background tasks.
* Added async file/path helpers and async port‑check before browser
connections.
* **Tests**
* Expanded unit tests for path helpers, image download success/failure,
prefs writing, and directory creation/renaming workflows.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
This PR addresses issue #708 by improving the README's About section to
make the bot's purpose clearer to new users. It also fixes a technical
inaccuracy in the configuration documentation.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #708
- **Motivation**: The current About section uses ambiguous terminology
("ads" instead of "listings") and doesn't clearly communicate what the
bot does. Additionally, the configuration example incorrectly documents
`shipping_costs` as available in `ad_defaults`, when it's only
implemented for per-ad configuration.
## 📋 Changes Summary
**About Section Improvements:**
- Changed "ads" to "listings" for clarity (addresses confusion mentioned
in #708)
- Added "Key Features" section with 6 concrete capabilities
- Added "Why This Project?" section explaining the rewrite and
differences from legacy client
- Preserved all legal disclaimers
**Configuration Documentation Fix:**
- Removed `shipping_costs` from `ad_defaults` example (not implemented
in `AdDefaults` Pydantic class)
- Added clarifying comment that `shipping_costs` and `shipping_options`
must be configured per-ad
- Verified `shipping_costs` remains documented in ad configuration
section
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
*Note: This is a documentation-only change with no code modifications.*
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (N/A -
documentation only).
- [x] I have formatted the code (N/A - documentation only).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (N/A - documentation only).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
## ℹ️ Description
This PR improves the CodeRabbit configuration to ensure all important
project files are reviewed while excluding only build artifacts and
temporary files.
The previous configuration used a blanket `!**/.*` exclusion that was
unintentionally filtering out the entire `.github` directory, including
workflows, dependabot config, issue templates, and CODEOWNERS files.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- **Added** `.github/**` to include all GitHub automation files
(workflows, dependabot, templates, CODEOWNERS)
- **Added** root config files (`pyproject.toml`, `*.yaml`, `*.yml`,
`**/*.md`)
- **Removed** overly broad `!**/.*` exclusion pattern
- **Added** specific exclusions for Python cache directories
(`.pytest_cache`, `.mypy_cache`, `.ruff_cache`)
- **Added** explicit IDE file exclusions (`.vscode`, `.idea`,
`.DS_Store`)
- **Added** `pdm.lock` exclusion to reduce noise
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Chores**
* Updated internal code review configuration and automation settings.
<sub>✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review
settings.</sub>
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
This PR fixes the update logic for shipping options.
A different dialog sequence is used in some categories which must be
taken into account.
Also the selection of the correct shipping sizes was refactured.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #687
## 📋 Changes Summary
- An check was added if two dialogs have to be closed in update mode
- Logic for setting package siz was refactured in update mode
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Bug Fixes**
* Improved shipping-option handling when editing listings: the flow now
more reliably navigates the shipping dialog, correctly selects or
deselects options based on item size and the desired configuration, and
avoids incorrect selections across size categories—resulting in more
consistent shipping choices when modifying ads.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
* Strengthen the session/logging/update-check tests to exercise real
resources and guards while bringing the update-check docs in line with
the supported interval units.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #N/A
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Reworked the `WebScrapingMixin` session tests so they capture each
`stop` handler before the browser reference is nulled, ensuring cleanup
logic is exercised without crashing.
- Added targeted publish and update-check tests that patch the async
helpers, guard logic, and logging handlers while confirming
`requests.get` is skipped when the state gate is closed.
- Updated `docs/update-check.md` to list only the actually supported
interval units (up to 30 days) and noted the new guard coverage in the
changelog.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->
## Summary by CodeRabbit
* **Tests**
* Expanded test coverage for publish workflow orchestration and update
checking interval behavior.
* Added comprehensive browser session cleanup tests, including
idempotent operations and edge case handling.
* Consolidated logging configuration tests with improved handler
management validation.
* Refined test fixtures and assertions for better test reliability.
<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
## ℹ️ Description
Currently version.py isn't checked by the linters. Ran linters manually
and fixed all lints.
- Link to the related issue(s): none
## 📋 Changes Summary
- Introduced shutil.which("git") so the helper explicitly locates the
Git binary and raises a clear error when it’s absent rather than relying
on a relative PATH.
- Switched to subprocess.run(..., capture_output=True, text=True) with
the located executable, guarding the call with check=True and # noqa:
S603 since the arguments are trusted.
- Made the timestamp timezone-aware with datetime.now(timezone.utc) to
avoid implicit local-time assumptions when creating the YYYY+<commit>
version string.
### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.
## ℹ️ Description
* Restrict coverage reporting to library files and collect per-suite
coverage data for Codecov’s flags.
- Link to the related issue(s): Issue #N/A
- Describe the motivation and context for this change.
## 📋 Changes Summary
- add `coverage:prepare` and per-suite `COVERAGE_FILE`s so each test
group writes its own sqlite and XML artifacts without appending
- replace the shell scripts with `scripts/coverage_helper.py`, scope the
report to `src/kleinanzeigen_bot/*`, and add logging/validation around
cleanup, pytest runs, and data combining
- ensure the helper works in CI (accepts extra pytest args, validates
file presence)
### ⚙️ Type of Change
- [x] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)
## ✅ Checklist
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.
