Jens 0ee0b2a4dc feat: improve codecov configuration for more reliable PR coverage checks (#646) ...

## ℹ️ Description
*Improve codecov configuration to address erratic PR blocking behavior
and provide better developer visibility into coverage impact.*

- Addresses inconsistent flag definitions between codecov.yml and
workflow
- Resolves confusing threshold values and separate flag status checks
- Improves developer experience with comprehensive PR comments

## 📋 Changes Summary

- Replace separate flag checks with single combined project coverage
check (70% target)
- Add patch coverage check (80% target) to catch regressions in changed
code
- Add comprehensive PR comments showing project, patch, and file-level
coverage
- Configure flag carryforward for better handling of partial test runs
- Remove confusing 0.2% integration threshold and separate flag status
checks
- Validate configuration with Codecov's official endpoint

### ⚙️ Type of Change
Select the type(s) of change(s) included in this pull request:
- [ ] 🐞 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [x] ✨ New feature (adds new functionality without breaking existing
usage)
- [ ] 💥 Breaking change (changes that might break existing user setups,
scripts, or configurations)

## ✅ Checklist
Before requesting a review, confirm the following:
- [x] I have reviewed my changes to ensure they meet the project's
standards.
- [x] I have tested my changes and ensured that all tests pass (`pdm run
test`).
- [x] I have formatted the code (`pdm run format`).
- [x] I have verified that linting passes (`pdm run lint`).
- [x] I have updated documentation where necessary.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice.

2025-10-18 19:44:11 +02:00

1.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw